Business is booming.

El-Zakzaky, Wife Sue AGF, DSS Over Passport Seizure, Demand N4bn In Damages

6

The head of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria, Sheik Ibrahim El-Zakzaky and his better half, Zeenah, have each pummeled a N2 billion suit against the Department of State Services and the Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami.



The suit which is at a Federal High Court in Abuja challenges the capture of their global visas by the Federal Government in spite of genuine wellbeing challenges.

The Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 and Sections 44, 37,36 and 46 (1) and (2) of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as revised) was documented by Marshal Abubakar of Femi Falana chambers and a duplicate of the Court measures shipped off The PUNCH.

The Director-General of the Department of State Services, Yusuf Bichi and Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) were recorded as first and second litigants for the situation with Ref. No: FHC/ABJ/CS/229/2021 and FHC/ABJ/CS/230/2021.



The offended parties in their different starting movement on-notice were looking for from the FHC a presentation that the capture of their visa No A50578740 and A50578739 since May 2019 was illicit and unlawful as it disregards their principal right to opportunity of development ensured by Section 41 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as altered) and Article 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights Act (CAP A9) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

Different requests were a request for the Court commanding the respondents to pay over to the candidates “the amount of N2 billion as broad and praiseworthy harm” for the infringement of their “privileges to opportunity of development, reasonable hearing and property” and a request for unending order controlling the respondents from further disregarding their “key freedoms in any way at all and howsoever without legal support.”



The couple likewise needs a statement from the Court that the Red Flag Traveling Restrictions put on their identifications and land borders “by the respondents without a court request is illicit and unlawful” as it disregards his entitlement to reasonable hearing ensured by Section 36 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended) and Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights Act (CAP A9) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

The offended parties likewise need the Court to announce that the refusal of the respondents to permit them to travel abroad for clinical treatment comprises a danger to their lives ensured by Section 33 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.



As indicated by them, the Court should command the respondents to deliver their worldwide identifications to empower them to get to immediate and sufficient clinical consideration as suggested by their PCPs.

Loading...

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More